Ben Gurion, oče Izraela: »Prišli smo in jim ukradli zemljo. Če bi bil arabski voditelj, se nikoli ne bi spravil z Izraelom!«

Slovenski predsednik vlade neprestano zagovarja Izrael, njegov zunanji minister opravičuje njegova dejanja, v stranki SDS pa izražajo neskrite simpatije do te države.

Istočasno jih javno podpirajo tudi t.i. razumniki, pa tako na primer Ernest Petrič ob razlagi zgodovine Izraela večkrat pojasni, da Izrael kar večkrat menda ni bil agresor. 

Pozablja pa predvsem na dejstvo, da je bil že sam nastanek Izraela kolonialistična agresija v najbolj čisti obliki.

V svoji razpravi na Katedrali svobode omeni zločine Hamasa, molči pa o tem, da je Izrael preko Katarja sam financiral Hamas in vedel za napade 7. oktobra 2023 vnaprej, nato pa s pomočjo Hanibalove direktive sam povzročil največ žrtev med izraelskimi civilisti.

petrickatedrala.png

S tem pa je dobil povod za izvedbo genocida, ki ga Petrič in podobni prav tako zanikujejo.

Očitno Petrič ne pozna niti pripravljenosti Hamasa na de facto priznanje Izraela oziroma:

Političnega dokumenta iz leta 2017: Hamas je sprejel nov programski dokument, v katerem je prvič uradno zapisal, da sprejema možnost ustanovitve palestinske države znotraj meja iz leta 1967. Kljub temu so v dokumentu poudarili, da še vedno ne priznavajo legitimnosti cionistične entitete (Izraela) in se ne odpovedujejo zgodovinskim pravicam do celotnega ozemlja Palestine. Analitiki so to potezo označili za poskus de facto priznanja obstoja Izraela kot politične realnosti (fait accompli). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Dogovore o premirju (2025–2026): V okviru mednarodnih pogajanj za končanje vojne v Gazi je Hamas pristal na večstopenjske mirovne načrte in dolgoročna premirja. Ta pogajanja so se osredotočala predvsem na umik izraelske vojske iz Gaze, izpustitev ujetnikov in odpravo blokade, ne pa na uradno diplomatsko priznanje državnosti Izraela. [1, 2, 3]

Nekoč profesor na Fakulteti za družbene vede je Petrič danes predstojnik katedre za mednarodno in evropsko pravo na Evropski pravni fakulteti Nove univerze.

Podobno propagando o Izraelu, ki menda nekaj počne kar na svojo roko in se samo brani in menda zlobnem Hamasu, ki je zaradi pajdašenja s terorizmom vedno krivec pa Petrič prodaja skupaj z Bogomirjem Ferfilo tudi v Domovini.

Da je med oboroženim odporom okupatorju in terorizmom velika razlika, bi nekdo, ki prihaja iz države, kjer so okupatorji nezakonito pobijali ujete bandite že lahko vedel, a z leti je Petriču spomin očitno precej opešal.

Nekdanji profesor FDV-ja s svojimi nastopi zato sramoti ne le sebe in Slovenijo, pač pa tudi tiste študente, ki jim je nekoč predaval in s(m)o ga cenili, vse dokler ni na tako zavržen način obrnil plošče.

domovinapetricferfila.png

Da je zadeva v renici obratna, kot menijo Janša, Petrič in trop njihovih podpornikov, da imajo Palestinci pravico do upora in da Izrael zanikuje njihovo pravico do samoodločbe ter izvaja genocid - s tem se vsi skupaj seveda ne strinjajo, je pato mnenje številnih uglednih mednarodnih pravnikov in tudiporočevalcev in organov OZN.

Vsem zagovornikom Izraela pa je zgodovinsko lekcijo pravkar dal svetovno znani ameriški profesor John Mearsheimer, idejni oče teorije ofenzivnega realizma.

Pred časom je v odmevnem intervjuju v podkastu Judging Freedom z nekdanjim sodnikom Andrewom Napolitanom je John Mearsheimer ostro kritiziral zunanjo politiko ZDA in Izraela glede konfliktov na Bližnjem vzhodu (v Gazi in Iranu).

Pri tem je potegnil zgodovinsko paralelo in izjavil, da bi — če bi danes potekalo sojenje po vzoru Nürnberških procesov za vojne zločine in agresijo — vodilni politični akterji, vključno z Donaldom Trumpom in Benjaminom Netanjahujem, končali na z obsodbo na smrt (bili obešeni).

Professor John Mearsheimer: "Listen carefully and pay close attention to what the founder of Israel, Ben-Gurion, says. I’m going to read two quotes from him. The first: ‘Why should the Arabs make peace? If I were an Arab leader, I would never make an agreement with Israel under any circumstances.’ Pay attention to what he is saying here. He said, ‘If I were an Arab leader, I would never make peace with Israel.’ He then went on to say,and this is the second quote from Ben-Gurion: ‘They see only one thing: we have come here and stolen their land, so why should they accept that?!’ Here is David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel and the founder of the State of Israel, openly saying: ‘We have stolen their land.’”

— Richard (@ricwe123) October 23, 2026

V zadnjem nastopu pa je dejal še naslednje:

»Pozorno poslušajte in bodite pozorni na to, kaj pravi ustanovitelj Izraela, Ben-Gurion. Prebral bom dva njegova citata. Prvi:

'Zakaj bi Arabci sklenili mir? Če bi bil arabski voditelj, se nikoli ne bi pod nobenim pogojem dogovoril z Izraelom.'

Bodite pozorni na to, kaj tukaj govori. Rekel je: 'Če bi bil arabski voditelj, se nikoli ne bi miril z Izraelom.'

Do NOT forget this! The immoral and brutal foundations of the zionist state: Consider what Ben-Gurion [who was the first prime minister of Israel and its primary national founder] wrote in his diary on January 1, 1948, at a time when he was involved in a series of important meetings with other Zionist leaders about how to deal with the Palestinians in their midst: “There is a need now for strong and brutal reaction. We need to be accurate about timing, place and those we hit. If we accuse a family—we need to harm them without mercy, women and children included. Otherwise, this is not an effective reaction… There is no need to distinguish between guilty and not guilty.” It is hardly surprising that this sort of guidance from the Zionist leadership—Ben Gurion was summarizing the emerging policy—led Jewish soldiers to commit atrocities.¹ ¹ Mearsheimer, John J.; Stephen M Walt. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy (Kindle Locations 2222-2230). Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.

— Hamza A. Tzortzis (@HATzortzis) October 12, 2023

Nato je nadaljeval, in navedel še drugi citat Ben-Guriona:

'Vidijo samo eno stvar: prišli smo sem in jim ukradli zemljo, zakaj bi torej to sprejeli?!'

Tukaj je David Ben-Gurion, prvi izraelski premier in ustanovitelj države Izrael, ki odkrito pravi:

'Ukradli smo jim zemljo.'«

Gre za zapis iz Ben Gurionovega dnevnika, ki ga je Mearsheimer citiral tudi v svoi uspešnici, knjigi z naslovom Izraelski lobi.

To je torej tisto, kar zagovarjajo tisti, ki branijo Izrael.

jansaizrael.jpg

Branijo krajo ozemlja - in genocid nad Palestinci, ki jim odrekajo pravico do samoodločbe.

Zaradi česar bi izvajalci te politike - morali viseti!

S tem teptajo isto pravico, na kateri je utemeljena neodvisna Slovenija, katere osvoboditev menda proslavljamo 25. oktobra.

Teptajo pravico, ki je ius cogens (kogentno oziroma imperativno normo) v sodobnem mednarodnem pravu. [1, 2]

Dolgo časa je v pravni doktrini veljalo splošno soglasje, da ima ta pravica status jus cogens, Komisija Združenih narodov za mednarodno pravo (ILC) pa jo je izrecno uvrstila na svoj seznam imperativnih norm splošnega mednarodnega prava.

Ta status je dokončno potrdilo tudi Meddržavno sodišče (ICJ) v svojem svetovalnem mnenju (npr. glede Palestine), kjer je izrecno razglasilo, da pravica do samoodločbe predstavlja imperativno normo mednarodnega prava (jus cogens). [1, 2, 3, 4]

Do NOT forget this! The immoral and brutal foundations of the zionist state: Consider what Ben-Gurion [who was the first prime minister of Israel and its primary national founder] wrote in his diary on January 1, 1948, at a time when he was involved in a series of important meetings with other Zionist leaders about how to deal with the Palestinians in their midst: “There is a need now for strong and brutal reaction. We need to be accurate about timing, place and those we hit. If we accuse a family—we need to harm them without mercy, women and children included. Otherwise, this is not an effective reaction… There is no need to distinguish between guilty and not guilty.” It is hardly surprising that this sort of guidance from the Zionist leadership—Ben Gurion was summarizing the emerging policy—led Jewish soldiers to commit atrocities.¹ ¹ Mearsheimer, John J.; Stephen M Walt. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy (Kindle Locations 2222-2230). Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.

— Hamza A. Tzortzis (@HATzortzis) October 12, 2023

Kdor nekritično brani Izrael, ta zanikuje to pravico, o kateri je Ernest Petrič napisal celo knjigo, nato pa njena spoznanja pozabil uporabiti v primeru Izraela...

Petrič in ostali apologeti Izraela, med katere spada tudi slovenski zunanji minister, pozabljajo tudi na opozorilo Alberta Einsteina, Hannah Arendt in drugih znanih židovskih intelektualcev, ki so nasprotovali cionističemu projektu nastanka Izraela.

Einstein je oče relativnostne teorije, Hannah Arendt (Hana Arent, rojena kot Johanna Arendt) pa je bila nemško-ameriška politična teoretičarka, filozofinja in zgodovinarka judovskega porekla. 

Velja za eno najbolj vplivnih znanstvenic 20. stoletja.

Pismo Alberta Einsteina in Hannah Arendt časopisu New York Times iz leta 1948 je jasno: ustanovitev judovske etnodržave v Palestini na račun tamkajšnjega domorodnega muslimanskega in krščanskega prebivalstva sta razumela kot hudo krivico in moralno katastrofo.

Albert Einstein and Hannah Arendt's 1948 letter to the New York Times: They saw the creation of a Jewish ethnostate in Palestine at the expense of its indigenous Muslim and Christian population as a profound injustice and moral catastrophe. Einstein and the other signatories explicitly compared Begin’s Herut (Freedom Party), born from the Irgun, to Nazis and Fascists, warning that their ideology of racial superiority and violent ethnic nationalism posed a grave danger to the moral and political future of the new state. - - - Full text of Einstein and Hannah Arendt's letter to the New York Times: TO THE EDITOR OF THE NEW YORK TIMES December 2, 1948 Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our time is the emergence in the newly created State of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy, and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine. The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections and to cement political ties with Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world could condone, even by silence, the appearance of such a party in Israel. Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultra-nationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other fascist parties, they have been used to break strikes, and they have encouraged demoralization among labor. In their actions they have been marked by cruelty and contempt for human life. During the recent past, they have systematically terrorized the Arab population, attacked Jewish settlements, and sabotaged the rescue of displaced Jews from Europe. A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war and had even fought off Arab bands that wanted to use it as their base. On April 9 (1948), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants — 240 men, women, and children — and kept a few of them alive to parade through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent an apology to King Abdullah of Transjordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of it, widely publicized it, and invited foreign correspondents to view the corpses and the ravaged village. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party. Within the Jewish community they have attempted to institute a reign of terror, have beaten up Jews who opposed them, and have, by gangster methods, terrorized the population. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world could condone, even by silence, the appearance of such a party in Israel. The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a warning to the American people concerning a danger to be found in the Freedom Party in Israel, a danger to which the leadership of Menachem Begin gives the greatest emphasis. (Signed): Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Sidney Hook, Rabbi Jessurun Cardozo, Irma Lindheim, and 22 other Jewish scholars, writers, and public figures. (Published December 4, 1948, in The New York Times.)

— Mats Nilsson (@mazzenilsson) May 24, 2026

Einstein in drugi podpisniki so Beginovo stranko Herut (Stranka svobode), ki je nastala iz organizacije Irgun, izrecno primerjali z nacisti in fašisti ter opozorili, da njihova ideologija rasne večvrednosti in nasilnega etničnega nacionalizma predstavlja resno nevarnost za moralno in politično prihodnost nove države.

nacistiizraelci.jpg

Zanimivo pa je nek drug Petrič precej drugače ocenil ravnanja Izraela - v preteklosti.

Na to nas je te dni spomnil Večer.

»V generalni skupščini Združenih narodov je izraelski zunanji minister Jigal Alon brez zadržkov obtožil Jugoslavijo, Indijo in Egipt, da so "namenoma sabotirali boj proti terorizmu in da so bili proti temu, da bi terorizem preprečili". Stalni predstavnik SFRJ v OZN Jakša Petrič je izraelske grobe laži in podtikanja odločno zavrnil in jih označil kot zlonamerne in zlobne. "Sploh nismo začudeni nad tem, saj od predstavnika vlade, ki leta in leta krši ustanovno listino OZN, mednarodnega določila prava in osnovne principe človečnosti, in ki se ne zmeni za zahteve velike večine držav, članic Združenih narodov, kaj drugega tudi pričakovati ne moremo,« je 12. oktobra 1976 dejal Jakša Petrič.

To lepo kaže, da zgodovinski razvoj ni vedno progresiven.

Ne le, da smo nekoč imeli predsednika izraelske vlade, celo očeta Izraela, ki je za razliko od lažnivega Netanjahuja (in Trumpa) govoril resnico, tudi v matični domovini smo imeli nekoč Petriče, ki za razliko od današnje blede kopije niso bili apologeti genocida.

In imeli smo državo, ki je branila preganjane narode in nasprotovala kolonializmu, danes pa imamo državo, ki podpira cionistično preganjanje Palestincev in je dobila vlado s pomočjo vmešavanja te iste kolonialistično-cionistične države v njene lastne volitve, kar pomeni tudi zanikanje slovenske samoodločbe in suverenosti!

Še več, ob tem imamo v državi celo t.i. intelektualce-apologete, ki so svoje kariere zgradili v času neuvrščene SFRJ, danes pa s svojimi enostranskimi razlagami de facto podpirajo kolonialistične in genocidne projekte Izraela in ZDA.