četrtek, 08. oktober 2026 leto 31 / št. 281
7. oktober 2023: Netanjahu za napad vedel in ga dopustil, nato so množično pobijali lastne državljane, to skrivajo!
Tretja obletnica napada Hamasa na Izrael v Gazi je minila ob navajanju številk o ubitih in ranjenih v tem napadu.
Bolj malo pa je bilo v osrednjih medijih razprav o tem, kako je do takšnega napada sploh prišlo in kaj se je dogajalo med njim in po njem.
Danes je kljub temu že jasno, da so v Izraelu za napad vodilni v vladi vedeli že vsaj leto dni pred napadom, opozorila pa so dobivali od tajnih služb držav v regiji celo neposredno pred izvedbo.
ISRAELI SOLDIERS TESTIFY: PATROLS ALONG GAZA BORDER WERE ORDERED TO STOP HOURS BEFORE OCT. 7 “We received orders on Oct. 7 to cancel all patrols along the Gaza border from 5:20 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.” https://t.co/QhSQavKud9
— Censored Humans (@CensoredHumans) October 6, 2026
Kljub temu so vojake in policiste poslali povsem drugam – v smer Zahodnega brega.
Seriously, does anyone think for a second that if Hamas had been waiting in tunnels with the kind of fire power capable of doing this to cars that the IDF would have been running around Gaza the way they have been for the past 3 years? The truth is that if Hamas had weapons capable of doing this, Hamas would be sitting in Tel Aviv today.
— Kerry Burgess (@KerryBurgess) October 7, 2026
Pri tem so očitno uporabili »Rooseveltovo taktiko«, znano iz primera Pearl Harbourja, kot opozarja eden od komentatorjev.
Ameriški predsednik Franklin D. Roosevelt se je namreč na napad na Pearl Harbor leta 1941 odzval z zgodovinskim govorom pred Kongresom, v katerem je 7. december 1941 označil za »dan, ki bo živel v sramoti«.
Vendar so v mesecih pred tem v ameriški vladi razpravljali o tem, kako pripraviti Japonce, da bodo sprožili prvi strel.
O tem so celo nekaj dni pred napadom uradno obvestili vojaške enote.
Ob tem so že dešifrirali japonske šifre in vedeli, kaj pripravljajo...
US had cracked Japanese code and KNEW Jap plans to attack, but Roosevelt did nothing. They wanted Pearl Harbour to enter WW2 https://t.co/SpivPTkOJ7 https://t.co/dkoPvuAITG
— BetterWisdomThanGold (@w4ytruthlife31_) December 7, 2017
V napadu na Pearl Harbour je umrlo 2.403 Američanov, ranjenih je bilo 1.178 ljudi, uničenih ali poškodovanih pa je bilo 21 ladij ter več kot 300 letal.
Po istem receptu so se nato zgodili tudi napadi 11. septembra leta 2001.
Le 33 minut po koncu govora je Kongres z veliko večino odobril vojno napoved Japonski, kar je Združene države Amerike uradno potisnilo v drugo svetovno vojno.
Danes je na podlagi zgodovinskih virov jasno, da je Roosevelt Japonski napad izzival, saj brez njega ne bi mogel popeljati ZDA v drugo svetovno vojno.
In ne pozabimo, da so ZDA, pokroviteljica Izraela, pogosto uporabljale taktiko zavajanj in laži pred svojimi napadi.
President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1941 Charles A. Beard 1948 Part 1 President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1941 Charles A. Beard 1948 is about the gap between what Americans were told in 1941 and what their government was doing. People need to know that before anything else. Beard’s premise is plain. Franklin Roosevelt entered that year carrying a public promise, made in the 1940 campaign, that American boys would not be sent into foreign wars and that the country would stay out unless attacked. He then moved the country toward war without ever asking Congress for a declaration. The speeches still said aid, patrol, defense, and conversations looking toward peace. The files said Lend-Lease, an Atlantic shooting war, an oil embargo on Japan, and a November 25 diary note on how to maneuver Japan into firing the first shot. Pearl Harbor, in this book, is not where the story starts. It is where the promise and the paper collide. The book is the sequel to American Foreign Policy in the Making, 1932–1940, and Yale University Press issued it in 1948. It runs past six hundred pages. Beard divides it into appearances, the unveiling of realities, the realities as the Pearl Harbor documents describe them, and an epilogue that tests the interpretations by what followed. He is not offering a battle history. He is putting the president’s words beside the record of the same months and asking which one a citizen was governing by. His opening sentence is the charge, and it is worth hearing as he wrote it. President Roosevelt entered the year 1941 carrying moral responsibility for his covenants with the American people to keep this nation out of war so to conduct foreign affairs as to avoid war. Those covenants were of two kinds. One was the platform: no war except in case of attack. The other was the voice. In Boston, on October 30, 1940, Roosevelt said, “Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.” Beard treats that sentence as a debt. Everything he assembles after it is evidence that the debt was not paid. He had believed a war story once. In 1917 he had wanted the United States in against Germany. The Devil Theory of War, in 1936, was the book in which he turned. Catastrophe, he had come to argue, is not delivered by a monster abroad to an innocent people. It is built by steps the same people later forget. The 1948 book applies that rule to a victory already declared good. He does not say Germany had no design, or Japan had no design. He says a real enemy does not erase your own sequence, and that “they attacked us” is not an audit of the year before the attack. The first fact he puts in front of the reader is the missing declaration. Through 1941 Roosevelt warned, asked for ships and plants and money, and did not ask Congress to declare war. Beard titles a chapter No Call for Any Declaration of War. The absence is the evidence. A declaration would have forced the question into the open, where the Constitution puts it, in front of people who had been told their sons were staying home. For Beard, this was not a minor constitutional technicality. The power to declare war belonged to Congress because the decision could condemn an entire generation to military service, death, injury, displacement, and the destruction of everything they had built. It was not supposed to become the private prerogative of a president who could progressively involve the nation in military operations and then ask its representatives to ratify the consequences. The danger, as Beard understood it, was that the executive could create the conditions of war without formally declaring one. Each individual measure could be defended as necessary for national security. Each could be described as defensive. But when those measures were joined together, the country might discover that its government had already assumed the obligations and dangers of a belligerent nation. https://t.co/UnJtXRF3gI
— ForgottenVolumes (@ForgottenV1918) October 8, 2026
Na zelo podoben način so v Izraelu dopustili, da do napada Hamasa pride, da bi lahko izvedli genocid nad Palestinci.
— david kersten (@davidkersten) September 30, 2026
Še več, Hamas so dolga leta pred tem celo sami financirali, preko Katarja, prav zato, da bi oslabili manj radikalno PLO in okrepili palestinski ekstremizem.
In ne samo to. Ob samem napadu je Izrael aktiviral tudi »Hanibalovo direktivo.«
Many Israeli citizens were killed by Israeli forces on October 7. 28 Apache helicopters used all their ammunition and had to be reloaded. Mainstream media will never tell you about the Hannibal Directive. Here’s our report with @pularjs on what really happened on Oct 7: https://t.co/GElOvs9Ral
— Double Down News (@DoubleDownNews) October 7, 2026
Hanibalova direktiva, politika, ki dovoljuje uporabo sile, da prepreči ujetništvo izraelskih vojakov, tudi če bi bila njihova življenja ogrožena, je bila 7. oktobra 2023 po poročanjih uporabljena na lokacijah, kot sta mejni prehod Erez in oporišče Re'im.
Nine minutes of testimonies from both Israeli soldiers and civilians explaining how the IDF killed their own people on October 7. https://t.co/anqchQ975p
— Censored Humans (@CensoredHumans) October 6, 2026
Haaretz in komisija ZN sta podrobno opisala ukaze za spreminjanje območij v cone poboja in tankovski ogenj, v katerem je bilo ubitih najmanj 14 izraelskih civilistov, vključno s talci v kibucu Be'eri.
Čeprav je Hamas zagrešil vojne zločine, kot so uboji civilistov in jemanje talcev, nobena uradna izraelska razčlenitev ne ločuje smrti palestinskih borcev od prijateljskega ognja, kar spodbuja pozive k preglednosti, medtem ko razprave še vedno trajajo.
The "special liquid" was Israel shooting Hellfire missiles from Apache helicopters.
— Empire Of Lies (@berningman16) October 8, 2026
O razmerah izraelskega pobijanja lastnih državljanov pa pričajo tudi kupi zažganih avtomobilov na glasbenem festivalu Nova, ki je bil prav tako tarča napadov.
Uničevali so jih kar s helikopterji in raketami hellfire oziroma »peklenski ogenj«. Tega so na zemlji ne za napadalce, pač pa tudi za lastne državljane ustvarile kar same izraelske »obrambne sile«, ki so sicer že leta v vojni s sedmimi okoliškimi držvami.
Star latinski izrek pravi: "qui tacet consentire videtur" (Kdor molči, je videti, da pritrjuje) Molk predsednice očitno pomeni, da podpira razloge Palestincev, ki so se odločili, da bodo judovske družine žive zažigali, razkosavali, posiljevali in ubijali. https://t.co/MviT53Coa3
— Sergij (@2021m2021) October 8, 2026
Da ob tem o pravici Palestincev, da se okupaciji Izraela uprejo, sploh ne govorimo…
