sreda, 21. oktober 2026 leto 31 / št. 294
Tisti, ki so vedeli: opozorila, sporočila in ljudje, ki so odšli pravočasno pred napadi 11. septembra
Vir: Wikimedia
Ob sedanjih vojnah se je potrebno večkrat vrniti na začetek - ali vsaj na enega od začetkov v zadnjem obdobju. In to obdobje se je začelo - z vojno proti terorizmu.
Leta 2001, pred 25. leti...
In marsikaj iz tega časa ostaja neraziskano vse do danes.
Dokumenti dokazujejo - opozoril pred napadi 11. septembra 2001 je bilo veliko, nekateri ljudje so bili obveščeni, nekateri so se pravočasno umaknili – in preiskave teh primerov niso bile opravljene z enako vnemo kot preiskava samih ugrabiteljev.
In glede na izkušnjo, ki jo imamo v Sloveniji s podjetjem Black Cube bi bil že čas, da se tudi o tem začnemo reso pogovarjati - tudi v Sloveniji.
Ne pa, da se takšni indici, ki kažejo na neznano organizacijo v ozadju velikih dogodkov na hitro odpravi s trditvijo, da gre za teorijo zarote.
Za začetek: julija 2001, manj kot dva meseca pred napadi, je podjetnik Larry Silverstein prevzel najem Svetovnega trgovinskega centra od luke Port Authority – posel vreden več kot 3 milijarde dolarjev. Pogajanja so bila izjemno trda, na trenutke prekinjena.
Po poročanju Wall Street Journala je Silverstein vztrajal pri eni stvari: da pogodba vključuje polno zavarovanje proti terorizmu.
Silverstein je konec julija 2001 podpisal pogodbo o 99-letnem najemu Svetovnega trgovinskega centra (WTC) in od takrat naprej je vsako jutro prihajal na zajtrk v restavracijo Windows on the World na vrhu severnega stolpa. Razen zjutraj 11. septembra.
Larry Silverstein owns the US Bank Tower in Los Angeles and now we are hearing reports of possible drone terror attacks in California Just two months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein ate breakfast on the 91st floor of the North Tower every single morning, except on 9/11 when his wife scheduled a doctor's appointment for him which he recounts below. Larry Silverstein's companies received $4.5 billion in insurance after 9/11.
— Red Panda Koala (@RedPandaKoala) March 12, 2026
To v letu 2001 ni bilo standardno – teroristično zavarovanje je bilo nišni, drag produkt, ki so ga sklepali po izjemnih okoliščinah.
Port Authority je ponujala nižjo premijo brez teroristične klavzule; Silverstein je odklonil. Zgodilo se je nemogoče: posel je bil sklenjen, z terorističnim zavarovanjem, šest tednov pred največjim terorističnim napadom v zgodovini.
Le niz naključij, kajne?
Po napadih pa je Silverstein pravno uveljavil celo stališče, da sta bili dve letali – dva ločena teroristična »dogodka« – in tako sprožil dvojno izplačilo.
Po sodnih bojih (dokončno 2004) je zbral okoli 4,55 milijarde dolarjev.
Tisti jutro Larry Silverstein ni bil v stavbi – dermatološki pregled, je pojasnil. Tisti dan niso bil v stavbi niti njegov sin niti hči. Sreča?
Seveda je možna. A sreča, statistika in pravna bitka za dvojno izplačilo tvorijo sliko, ki je razumna preiskava ne bi smela spustiti iz rok – Komisija 9/11 o vsem tem ni poročala niti z besedo.
49 days before 9/11, billionaire Larry Silverstein signed a $3.2 BILLION deal for the Twin Towers. On the morning of the attacks, he was supposed to be inside one of them. Instead, he was at home. Years later, he would receive $4.55 BILLION in insurance payouts. Here's what happened. On July 24, 2001, Silverstein and his partners secured a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center complex. The property carried approximately $3.55 billion in insurance coverage, including protection against terrorist attacks. After taking over, Silverstein began holding regular morning meetings with tenants at Windows on the World, the restaurant near the top of the North Tower. He was scheduled to be there on September 11. But that morning, his wife insisted he keep a dermatologist appointment he had planned to cancel. Silverstein stayed home to get ready for the doctor. That decision kept him away from the towers when the first plane struck. Both towers were destroyed, and nearly 3,000 people were killed in the attacks. Then came a massive insurance battle. Silverstein argued that the two plane crashes should count as two separate insured events. That interpretation could have entitled him to as much as $7.1 billion instead of $3.55 billion. Insurance companies disagreed. After years of litigation, the total insurance recovery reached approximately $4.55 billion in 2007. The funds were intended to help finance rebuilding, not simply become his personal profit. A $3.2 billion lease. 49 days before the attacks. A last-minute doctor's appointment. And one of the largest insurance disputes in American history. What part of this story surprises you most?
— koba (@kobaHUB) October 21, 2026
Uradna pripoved o 11. septembru 2001 namreč zahteva, da verjamemo, da je bil napad popolno presenečenje.
Kot na primer napad Hamasa 7. oktobra leta 2023.
Opazite podobnost?
Dokumenti, ki so bili deklasificirani ali razkriti v zadnjih 25 letih, kažejo nekaj drugega: da je bilo opozoril veliko, da so bili nekateri ljudje obveščeni, da so se nekateri pravočasno umaknili – in da preiskave teh primerov niso bile opravljene z enako vnemo kot preiskava samih ugrabiteljev.
Vozilo, visoko peto in kamere
Na strehi v New Jerseyju, z razgledom na goreče stolpe, je policija 11. septembra 2001 aretirala pet državljanov Izraela.
Vozilo podjetja Urban Moving Systems je vsebovalo gotovino, več potnih listov, kartonske nože in zemljevid z označenimi točkami.
Five Israeli nationals - later known as the 'Dancing Israelis' - were arrested on September 11, 2001, in a van belonging to Urban Moving Systems, a New Jersey company. Multiple witnesses reported them filming the burning towers from a rooftop in Liberty State Park - 'high-fiving,' taking photographs with the towers burning in the background. When arrested, the van contained: cash, multiple passports, and box cutters - the same weapon used by the hijackers. One individual had a map with key locations highlighted. Another tested positive for explosive residue. They were held for 71 days under immigration violations. They reportedly failed multiple lie detector tests. They were quietly deported to Israel - where they appeared on an Israeli television talk show and stated: 'Our purpose was to document the event.' This statement was an admission of foreknowledge. You cannot prepare to 'document' an event you don't know is going to happen. Urban Moving Systems - their employer - was identified in an FBI memo as a Mossad front. The owner, Dominik Suter, fled to Israel immediately after FBI raids. He was never charged. No grand jury was convened. Five men with foreknowledge, explosive residue, box cutters, and multiple passports - employed by a Mossad front company - were deported without prosecution.
— QINTELPRO (@QINTELPRO_) September 9, 2026
Priče so jih opisale kot ljudi, ki so se veselili in slikali – zato je zgodba v literaturi znana kot »plešoči Izraelci«.
Pristojni FBI je v notranjem memorandumu, ki je bil razkrit, Urban Moving Systems označil za domnevno prevzelo podjetje (front) – po nekaterih različicah povezano z Mosadom.
Lastnik Dominik Suter je po hišnih preiskavah izginil v Izraelu; niti obtožnica ni bila vložena.
Pet moških je bilo zadržanih 71 dni in nato deportiranih. V izraelski televizijski oddaji je eden izjavil, da je bil njihov namen to document the event – dokumentirati dogodek.
Dokumentiraš lahko le dogodek, za katerega veš, da se bo zgodil.
Ali je bila to izjava o predznanju ali nespretna formulacija – to je bilo vprašanje, ki ga ameriška preiskava ni postavila pod prisego.
The FBI said that Urban moving systems vans where found in locations of significance to 9/11 investigations. Urban moving systems was the company that the “Dancing Israelis” at 9/11 were working for. In case you don’t know a group of Israelis were arrested and investigated on 9/11 for celebrating and videoing the “terror attacks” take place.
— nQthing to see here (@NQthing2see) March 22, 2025
Zvezni sodnik je leta 2004 v civilni tožbi ugotovil, da je bilo ravnanje države »skandalozno« v delu, ki se tiče odvzema gradiva.
Sistemski opozorilni znaki
Podjetje Odigo, izraelski ponudnik sporočilnih storitev, je priznalo, da sta njegova dva zaposlena približno dve uri pred napadi prejela opozorilo o »velikem dogodku« v New Yorku – neidentificiranega.
Izraelska ladjarska družba ZIM je pisarne v WTC zaprla in izpraznila približno teden dni prej, kljub kazni za prekinitev najema.
Vsak od teh podatkov je morda naključje; vsak od njih je bil tudi vreden preiskave, ki ni bila nikoli zaključena.
Hkrati je uradni zapis zelo natančen o tem, da so ameriške obveščevalne službe napad mogle preprečiti: generalni inšpektor Ministrstva za pravosodje (2004) je dokumentiral, da je Alec Station CIA zadrževala informacije o dveh bodočih ugrabiteljih, ki sta bila na ameriški zemlji, celo po tem, ko so bile zahtevane; FBI-ovi agenti na terenu so opozarjali na sumljive flight school polaze in so bili zavrnjeni; dnevni obveščevalni poročevali so 6. avgusta 2001 nosili naslov »Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US«.
To ni teorija zarote; to je ugotovitev uradnega inšpektorja.
Savdska vpletnost in 28 strani poročila
Po drugi strani je Senat razkritje 28 strani poročila o 11. septembru zadrževal desetletje; ko so bile končno objavljene (2016), so potrdile finančne in logistične veze med krogi v Rijadu in nekaterimi od 19 ugrabiteljev – vključno z Osamo bin Ladenom na papirju, ki pa so ga preiskovalci zabeležili kot podporo, ne kot izvedbo.
In 11 od 19 ugrabiteljev je bilo Savdijcev.
Leta 2021 je FBI poskušal zadevo tiho zapreti.
A tu je paradoks, ki ga uradna razlaga ne prenese: če so indici kazali na vpletenost Savdske Arabije v napade in na povezave v Rijadu, zakaj je bila sprožena vojna proti Bagdadu in ne proti Rijadu?
Sedaj pa imamo še sodobni presedan, ki ga uradna zgodovina ne more več zavreči: novembrske raziskave New York Timesa (2023) o napadu 7. oktobra 2023 so dokumentirale, da je izraelska obveščevalna služba imela načrt Hamasovega napada več kot leto dni vnaprej, z opozorili vseh ravni – in ga je zavrnila kot nerealnega.
15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi nationals. Osama bin Laden was the son of a Saudi construction magnate with close ties to the royal family. The ideological backbone of al-Qaeda — Wahhabism — is state-supported in Saudi Arabia and has been aggressively exported using billions in petrodollar-funded religious outreach. But the Saudi connection to 9/11 goes far beyond ideology. Prince Bandar bin Sultan — the Saudi Ambassador to the U.S. — was so close to the Bush family that he was nicknamed “Bandar Bush.” His wife, Princess Haifa, sent monthly checks to an intermediary who funded two of the San Diego hijackers. The intermediary was Omar al-Bayoumi — later confirmed to be on Saudi intelligence (GID) payroll. The ambassador’s wife was funding the hijackers through a Saudi intelligence asset.
— QINTELPRO (@QINTELPRO_) May 15, 2026
Dejstvo, da obveščevalni aparat »ve in ne ukrepa«, ni več domišljija; je dokumentirana, sodobna praksa.
To ne dokazuje nič o letu 2001.
Dokazuje pa, da je bila uradna razlaga »presenečenja« v 25 letih dokončno omajana – tudi pri tistem, o čemer se uradno nikoli ni podvomilo.
Viri: ABC News 20/20, The White Van (2002); The Forward, poročila o Urban Moving Systems (2001); FBI memorandum, razkrit prek FOIA (2011); DOJ Office of Inspector General, Report on CIA-FBI information sharing (2004); President's Daily Brief, 6. avgust 2001 (deklasificirano); Senate Intelligence Committee, 28 pages (2016); The New York Times, The Day Before (november–december 2023); insajder.com/svet/zakaj-ni-cia-pravocasno-preprecila-teroristicnih-napadov-11-septembra-ce-so-bili-nekateri; insajder.com/svet/enajsti-september-dve-zgodbi-vse-vec-dokazov-da-stolpnici-wtc-nista-padli-zaradi-kerozina-pac
