Kaja spet v akciji: Bojkotirajte Putina, nadaljujte vojno v Ukrajini!

Morebitna vrnitev Vladimirja Putina na vrh G20 na Floridi decembra prinaša tveganje normalizacije ruskih »vojnih zločinov« v Ukrajini, je dejala šefica zunanje politike EU Kaja Kallas.

»Normalizacija vrnitve Rusije na te mednarodne forume dejansko pomeni normalizacijo vojnih zločinov, ki se zdaj vsak dan dogajajo v Ukrajini,« je Kallasova dejala v intervjuju za Bloomberg TV.

After Obama's 2014 coup in Kiev, NATO's growing presence in Ukraine led eventually to Russia's direct military intervention on 24 Feb 2022. Labeled in the West as an “unprovoked full-scale invasion,” Russia’s limited “SMO” was aimed at forcing negotiations to end the conflict. Six weeks later, mediated by Turkey, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators convened talks in Istanbul. Discussions included security guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for adopting a neutral, permanent non-nuclear status. Ukraine expressed a willingness to give up its ambitions to join NATO and discussed making Russian an official language. As a gesture of good will, on 30 March, Russia began withdrawing forces from the city of Bucha, near Kiev. The next day, 31 March, Anatoly Fedoruk, mayor of Bucha, recorded a video message happily confirming the withdrawal of all Russian forces. He did not mention any bodies strewn in the streets. However, on 2 April, Western media began reporting that Russian troops had murdered hundreds of people execution-style, leaving the corpses on the street. Zelensky immediately accused Russian troops of committing a massacre, declaring on CBS’s Face the Nation, that it was “an attack on the nation and the Ukrainian people.” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitri Kuleba called on the G7 countries to immediately impose “new devastating sanctions” on Russia, including imposing an embargo on Russian coal, gas, and oil, closing ports to Russian vessels, and disconnecting Russian banks from the SWIFT banking system. The Bucha story emerged when both sides, albeit with varying degrees of optimism, were reporting progress in the negotiations. Ukrainian diplomat Oleksandr Chalyi recalled, “Putin tried everything possible to conclude an agreement,” adding, “the two sides managed to find a compromise and were close to finalizing the war with a peaceful settlement.” Denying that their soldiers would deliberately kill civilians, the Russian Defense Ministry called for a UN Security Council investigation. French journalist Adrien Bocquet, who was in the region, testified that he saw bodies thought to be "pro-Russian sympathizers," marked with white ribbons, unloaded from lorries and arranged on the street to create the impression of a “mass killing.” Following reports of the alleged massacre, Zelensky withdrew from the peace talks, and Boris Johnson flew to Kiev and told Zelensky, “keep fighting, we have your back." (Later in April, the Guardian reported that Christopher Harborne, a leading shareholder in a British weapons company, had paid Johnson a million pounds to convince Zelensky not to sign any deal.) Bucha sabotaged any chance for an early peace that would have spared the lives of two million Russian and Ukrainian troops and thousands of civilians. Bucha also hardened Russia’s isolation from Europe and increased NATO’s determination “to take the war to Russia.” Today, over four years later, we have a wider, more dangerous war and no prospects for peace.

— Alan Watson (@DietHeartNews) November 1, 2026

Putin še ni potrdil, ali se bo udeležil decembrskega vrha, ki ga gostijo ZDA.

Izjave Kaje Kallas so sledile prihodu ruskega zunanjega ministra Sergeja Lavrova na ministrsko srečanje G20 v Atlanti.

Ameriški državni sekretar Marco Rubio, ki je gostil srečanje, je odpovedal tradicionalno skupno fotografiranje, potem ko so uradniki Evropske unije zavrnili stati poleg Lavrova.

G20: RUBIO TALKS ABOUT NATIONAL INTERESTS, WHILE BRUSSELS CONTINUES TO SELL ITS ILLUSIONS! By @BPartisans In Atlanta, Marco Rubio has just committed a diplomatic faux pas: reminding everyone that foreign policy serves first and foremost to defend a country’s interests. This revelation is likely unbearable for the residents of Brussels, who seem to have turned the European Union into a psychiatric institution of geopolitics, where every economic failure is celebrated as a moral victory. Rubio talks about energy, trade, raw materials, industry, and security of supply. These are base, material concerns, almost vulgar, to a European Commission that seems to have elevated economic self-mutilation to the status of a strategic doctrine. Where Washington seeks to secure its resources, Brussels cultivates its dependencies. Where Americans defend their industry, Europeans are drafting an elegant eulogy for it. And the most delightful part is Russia. Rubio is talking with Lavrov. Sacrilege! An American diplomat who dares to speak to a Russian without first seeking absolution from Kaja Kallas! In Brussels, they must already be searching for the article in the European treaty prohibiting the use of a telephone in the presence of an adversary. For this is the immense genius of European diplomacy: refusing to speak with Moscow, then taking offense at not being included in the negotiations. Voluntarily putting oneself offside and then accusing the referee of conspiracy. Even in a diplomatic asylum, it would take a certain talent to reach this level of absurdity. When it comes to China, it’s the same old farce. Washington wants to control its supply chains. Brussels, for its part, dreams of strategic sovereignty, despite closing factories, expensive energy, imported minerals, and an American military umbrella. It’s the independence of an over-indebted tenant who thinks he owns the building. Let’s not be mistaken: Rubio didn’t come to hand out doves of peace. The United States will continue to impose sanctions, issue threats, and assert its interests whenever it suits them. However, unlike the Europeans, they at least have the decency not to systematically disguise their economic calculations as a messianic crusade. And that’s where the spectacle becomes downright obscene. While Washington negotiates with its rivals, Brussels lectures its partners. While the major powers defend their resources, the European Union asks its citizens to finance geopolitical ambitions for which no one seems willing to foot the final bill. The G20 will not have reconciled the planet. But it will have reminded us of an obvious truth: the world is not a homeowners’ association meeting chaired by Ursula von der Leyen. America defends its interests, China defends its own, and so does Russia. As for Brussels, it mainly defends its own perception of its own importance. And the Europeans? They pay the bills, bear the sacrifices, and are asked to applaud. Welcome to the Europe of values: prosperity is optional, the bill is mandatory.

— Brainless Partisans  (@BPartisans) October 31, 2026

V intervjuju je Kallasova pojasnila, da diplomati EU »nočejo stati ob njem (Lavrovu) na teh forumih«, glede na to, da je pod mednarodnimi sankcijami.

Gre seveda za sankcije zahodnih zaveznikov, ki jih niso odobrili organi OZN, zato gre za enostranske sankcije, ki so samo pogojno mednarodne, večji del sveta pa jih sploh ne spoštuje.

@Daviku35 Que diferentes países europeos tuviesen enfrentamientos entre ellos no significa que no tengan la misma base cultural. Siempre ha habido luchas por motivos políticos, tanto en Europa como en todo el mundo.

— Lazoiro (@lazoiro) November 1, 2026

Vendar je Kallasova dodala, da prisotnost Lavrova ponuja priložnost za »takojšen odziv na laži«, ki prihajajo iz Rusije.

Kallasova, dokazana rusofobinja z nezadostnim poznavanjem zgodovine in dejstev, še vedno ni pojasnila, na katere »laži« sploh meri.

 «Kaja Kallas è il più grande errore nella storia dell’UE» — Berliner Zeitung. ▪️ Il quotidiano critica la responsabile della diplomazia dell’UE per la sua assenza dai negoziati sul conflitto in Ucraina. ▪️ I leader di Finlandia e Norvegia hanno contattato autonomamente Putin per discutere della fine del conflitto. ▪️ «Da quattro anni, l’UE non ha né attrattiva né un piano», afferma il primo ministro norvegese Jonas Gahr Støre. ▪️ Mosca, Washington e Pechino non considerano Kallas un interlocutore negoziale di rilievo. La sua presenza ai prossimi colloqui trilaterali tra Russia, Stati Uniti e Ucraina, che si terranno ad Abu Dhabi, non è prevista. Per fortuna, la gente sta iniziando a capire.

— Erny110393  (@erny110393) November 1, 2026

»Kaja Kallas je največja napaka v zgodovini EU,« piše Berliner Zeitung.

▪️ Časnik kritizira visoko predstavnico EU za zunanje zadeve zaradi njene odsotnosti pri pogajanjih o konfliktu v Ukrajini.
▪️ Voditelja Finske in Norveške sta se neodvisno obrnila na Putina, da bi razpravljala o končanju konflikta.
▪️ »EU že štiri leta nima ne privlačnosti ne načrta,« pravi norveški premier Jonas Gahr Støre.
▪️ Moskva, Washington in Peking Kallasove ne obravnavajo kot pomembne pogajalske partnerice. Ne pričakuje se, da bo prisotna na prihajajočih tristranskih pogovorih med Rusijo, Združenimi državami in Ukrajino, ki naj bi potekali v Abu Dhabiju, sklene nemški časnik.

@BowesChay https://t.co/J4oWAv86Lh

— manupen33 (@manupen33) October 30, 2026

Kallasova je pozdravila odločitev ZDA, da Ukrajini proda 500 prestreznikov za raketni sistem Patriot, in jo ocenila kot »zelo pozitiven razvoj dogodkov«.

Pozvala je zaveznike Zahoda, naj zaostrijo sankcije proti Rusiji.

No Nazis in Ukraine? Just torchlit parades full of black clad masked men who- Look like Nazis Worship Nazis Commemorate Nazis Love Nazis. https://t.co/zeVZYII7W2

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) November 1, 2026

Toda zavrnila je zahteve Pentagona, naj baltske države Nata omilijo svoje kritike na račun Kremlja.

@toddlershares @ivan_8848 

— Insajder.com (@insajder_com) November 2, 2026

»Vprašanje je: če ne govoriš o grožnji, ali ta izgine?

Mislim, da ne izgine,« je pojasnila Kallasova.